|
For a thing to be defective it must be a thing – a commodity, a utility, a product.
At the very least, it must be a sprocket or cog indented to fit into a machine.
When a human being is called “defective,” two serious dilemmas are raised:
1) For an individual to be defective, they must first be regarded as a commodity,
utility, product, or at least a cog that does not fit the machine.
2) For an individual to be seen as a defective cog, commodity, or product,
one must assume that society is a kind of machine or product line.
Are we cogs?
For a citizen to be deemed a defective part, one must assume that society is an
otherwise functional machine – a gear is not really defective unless it was meant
to be part of a functioning machine. For a human being to be regarded as a commodity
or product, society must be regarded as an otherwise satisfied customer.
A product without a hungry customer is not really a product.
My point is simply that a society cannot have defective members unless
it has a valid purpose for them to begin with. If society is screwed up,
dysfunctional, corrupt, ineffective, and riddled with bizarre superstition
and the intentional proliferation of ignorance, then how can it single out any
one member as defective? How can a part be defective when the machine was
already broken?
Witch trial: Who, In This Picture, Is Crazy?
One historical example comes to mind, that of Sarah Good. Sarah Good was a deluded,
mentally ill 62 year-old woman whose bouts with bipolar disorder had cost her a husband
and her family fortune. Finally homeless, she started going door to door babbling
incoherently and upsetting the neighbors. She was tried as a witch and hanged.
Was she defective? Imagine an objective observer witnessing the humiliating trial
in which an obviously mentally ill senior citizen was found guilty of having evil
powers and hanged.
If the moment of her hanging could be frozen in time like a snapshot, who could to
point to the 62 year-old woman dangling from the rope and say, “Yeah, she’s
the defective one in this picture.”
This may be an extreme and antiquated example, but it illustrates that when people
are called defective, it is often society that is a little bit off.
|